Issue

Laguna Beach Setbacks Appeal

From ActCoastal

Month April
Year 2019
Summary The City of Laguna Beach had approved a permit for a 1600 square-foot addition and remodel of a blufftop home with additional structures, grading and landscaping; the proposed renovations would have expanded the floor area beyond an additional 50-percent, making it a major remodel. The project came before the Commission on appeal, with staff recommending denial.

Staff explained that the proposed project would not conform with the City’s Land Use Element (LUE) which specifies a minimum 25-foot setback from the bluff edge – this development would actually be sited seaward of the bluff edge, on the bluff face, in direct conflict with the LUE. The applicant spent an inordinate amount of time disputing Coastal Commission staff’s definition of the bluff edge to, ultimately, no avail.

The existing home already does not conform to modern oceanfront bluff edge setbacks, and the Commission found that the City-approved addition would also increase the size and degree of nonconformity, which is prohibited under the Coastal Act. By denying this proposal, Commissioners affirmed that major improvements, beyond repair and maintenance, may not increase degree of nonconformity. Commissioners denied the proposed remodel in a 7-2 vote.

Outcome Green Dot.png
Outcome Description Commissioner Mary Luévano expressed unease. “If we go in one direction we begin a sea change in the way we develop or don’t along the coast,” she said, adding that we need to err on the side of caution in protecting public resources. Commissioner Luéveno motioned to deny the proposal. Commissioner Sara Aminzadeh agreed, pointing out that the proposed development is in direct conflict with several of the City’s Local Coastal Program policies.

Commissioner Mark Vargas pondered how this might translate into managed retreat in Laguna Beach, noting that neighboring homes in may not be able to do any further major development.

Why You Should Care As proposed, the project would have set a negative precedent by allowing new development on a bluff face that requires hard armoring to assure geologic stability, contrary to numerous policies in the certified LCP for Laguna Beach. As sea levels rise, new development and perpetuation of non-conforming development that results in more hard armoring will increase beach loss and greatly impact public resources.
Image Screen Shot 2019-04-23 at 12.53.46 PM.png
Decision Type De Novo
Staff Recommendation Denial
Staff Report https://documents.coastal.ca.gov/reports/2019/4/Th18a/Th18a-4-2019-report.pdf
Lobbyist/Agent Anne Blemker, Susan McCabe, Steve Kaufmann
Opposition to Project Mark Fudge - Appellant
Coastal Act Policies Chapter 3

Voting Detail for Laguna Beach Setbacks Appeal


Individual vote detail for Issue: Laguna Beach Setbacks Appeal
CommissionerVote
Roberto UrangaBad Vote
Sara AminzadehGood Vote
Donne BrownseyGood Vote
Steve PadillaBad Vote
Dayna BochcoGood Vote
Erik HowellAbsent for Vote
Carole GroomGood Vote
Mary LuevanoGood Vote
Effie Turnbull-SandersAbsent for Vote
Mark VargasGood Vote
Aaron PeskinGood Vote


Meeting Page

View Meeting Page for the meeting where this issue was discussed/voted on.