Issue

Santa Barbara County short-term rentals

From ActCoastal

Month May
Year 2018
Summary Santa Barbara County requested an amendment to its Local Coastal Program (LCP) to add new regulations to address short-term rentals and homestays. As proposed, the amendment excludes short-term rentals from residential zoning districts, except within a proposed Short-term Rentals Coastal Historic Overlay in the residentially zoned neighborhood of Miramar Beach. The amendment allows for homestays in residential zones.

The California Coastal Protection Network (CCPN) spoke in opposition to the County’s proposal, along with several residents. CCPN opposed the ban due to its conflicts with the Coastal Commission’s mandate to protect maximum public access, stating that reasonable short-term regulations are acceptable but de facto bans are not the answer and that the staff recommendation with suggested modifications to allow homestays and short-term rentals in guest houses in residential zones is inadequate and will do little to mitigate the de facto ban.

The County’s proposal to ban short-term rentals in residential zones with the sole exception of Miramar beach is suspect. The homes at Miramar are very expensive and located adjacent to the Rosewood Miramar Resort developed by Rick Caruso, who has referred to the resort as “the most expensive hotel in California.” With these two exclusive lodging options, the beach will effectively become a private beach for those who can afford to stay there.

Ultimately, Commissioners agreed that the County of Santa Barbara needs to reconsider their short-term rental ordinance proposal and denied the LCP amendment in a 7-3 vote.

Outcome Green Dot.png
Outcome Description Commissioner Mark Vargas supported the staff recommendation, with the caveat that they have to be careful because they may be protecting high-cost accommodations. He recommended a three-year reevaluation of the overlay portion of the ordinance and made an amending motion. The motion failed 7-3.

Chair Dayna Bochco disagreed with Commissioner Vargas and stated that it is difficult to find a place to stay and the hotels are extremely expensive. She felt the LCP amendment was premature and the County needs to continue to work on their plan for increasing low cost accommodations on the coast.

Commissioner Erik Howell did not support the staff recommendation or county’s proposal, stating the proposal is too restrictive. He motioned to reject the amendment and Commissioner Steve Padilla seconded the motion. Ultimately, the LCP amendment was rejected 7-3.

Why You Should Care Short-term rental regulations are a statewide issue and many local jurisdictions are bringing forth their proposed regulations to the Coastal Commission. Short-term rentals serve a definite function in providing public access, especially in Santa Barbara County where low-cost accommodations are scarce. The de facto ban is not consistent with the Coastal Act’s mandate to maximize public access to the coast.
Image [[File:|200px]]
Decision Type LCP Amendment
Staff Recommendation Approval with modifications
Staff Report https://documents.coastal.ca.gov/reports/2018/5/th19a/th19a-5-2018-report.pdf
Lobbyist/Agent
Opposition to Project CCPN, Local Residents
Coastal Act Policies Chapter 3

Th19a, (LCP-4-STB17-0086-3)

Voting Detail for Santa Barbara County short-term rentals


Individual vote detail for Issue: Santa Barbara County short-term rentals
CommissionerVote
Roberto UrangaAbsent for Vote
Aaron PeskinBad Vote
Carole GroomGood Vote
Sara AminzadehGood Vote
Erik HowellGood Vote
Dayna BochcoGood Vote
Steve PadillaGood Vote
Ryan SundbergBad Vote
Mark VargasBad Vote
Donne BrownseyGood Vote
Effie Turnbull-SandersAbsent for Vote
Mary LuevanoGood Vote


Meeting Page

View Meeting Page for the meeting where this issue was discussed/voted on.