Special

Browse wiki

Issue:AB 1129 – Coastal Access and Preservation Act
DecisionType Bill Support  +
IssueImage Strands point sand loss nexus (1).jpg  +
IssueMonth May  +
IssueOutcome Good  +
IssueOutcomeDescription The California Coastal Protection Network
The California Coastal Protection Network (CCPN), , testified in support of the bill on behalf of the Nature Conservancy, the bill’ sponsor. CCPN also requested Coastal Commission support for the bill. Commissioner Brownsey expressed concern for calling out seawalls specifically as eligible for administrative penalties and leaving out other equally important subject matters. Enforcement staff responded that the bill’s language intends to clarifying existing law in order to make it easier to move forward. Commissioner Carole Groom made a motion to support the bill and was seconded by Commissioner Aaron Peskin. Commissioner Erik Howell spoke against the bill stating that he is concerned that this will discourage seawalls that may bring public benefits. Ultimately, commissioners voted to support the bill 11-1.
missioners voted to support the bill 11-1.  +
IssueReason AB 1129 would help the Commission better e
AB 1129 would help the Commission better enforce existing laws by allowing for penalties and fines for illegal development, including shoreline protective structures. The measure also ensures that emergency permits for any coastal development include a plan for removal. Coastal armoring fixes the shore in place and lead to loss of public beaches and can have detrimental impacts to shoreline habitat. Given impending impacts from sea level rise, all shoreline protective devices should receive extremely careful analysis.
should receive extremely careful analysis.  +
IssueSummary This bill would amend PRC 30235 to define
This bill would amend PRC 30235 to define “existing structure” as structures built prior to January 1, 1977, and to specify that shoreline protection devices must be approved consistent with the Coastal Act policies protecting public access, shoreline ecology, natural landforms and other impacts on coastal resources. The bill would specify that emergency permits issued for shoreline protective devices are intended to allow the minimum amount of temporary development necessary to address the emergency situation. The bill would also amend PRC 30821 to allow for the imposition of administrative penalties for unpermitted shoreline protective devices. Staff recommended support of the bill and the need for close analysis of seawalls, especially given the extremely pressing issue of sea level rise and the need to appropriately address its impacts while preserving public resources. Commissioners approved support of the bill on a vote of 11-1.
ved support of the bill on a vote of 11-1.  +
IssueYear 2,017  +
Policies Chapter 3  +
StaffRecommendation Support  +
StaffReport https://coastal.ca.gov/meetings/agenda/#/2017/5  +
Has query
This property is a special property in this wiki.
Issue:AB 1129 – Coastal Access and Preservation Act + , Issue:AB 1129 – Coastal Access and Preservation Act +
Categories Issues
Modification date
This property is a special property in this wiki.
21 May 2017 23:12:33  +
hide properties that link here 
Vote:Vote 1d9fxjhil + , Vote:Vote 43hklx7vb + , Vote:Vote 4mw4e1cnh + , Vote:Vote 5fxuucou7 + , Vote:Vote 61rxv254y + , Vote:Vote 6djnmcym3 + , Vote:Vote cjvv6tvmf + , Vote:Vote fmze0ljrd + , Vote:Vote qo25iumur + , Vote:Vote r83guhvwn + , Vote:Vote ws7thozdj + , Vote:Vote z7f1l6lrf + VoteIssue
 

 

Enter the name of the page to start browsing from.