Special

Browse wiki

Issue:Belmont Beach Aquatic Center
DecisionType Appeal  +
IssueImage Screen Shot 2021-02-11 at 12.13.44 PM.jpg  +
IssueMonth February  +
IssueOutcome Bad  +
IssueOutcomeDescription Commissioner Effie Turnbull-Sanders led th
Commissioner Effie Turnbull-Sanders led the discussion about the importance of baking environmental justice into the City’s project, rather than sprinkling it on top with an undefined public transportation plan. She suggested that the City include a program to help elevate inland swimmers to the elite competition level and to include more community services that will ensure the entire City can benefit from the pool. The City promised to incorporate those suggestions leading a majority of Commissioners to approve the project.
y of Commissioners to approve the project.  +
IssueReason Nobody opposes building a new public pool.
Nobody opposes building a new public pool. But the proposed location is clearly the wrong place - on the public beach and far from low-income communities that may benefit the most from this massive public investment. Competitive swimming is not a coastal dependent use. We must not sacrifice our open beaches and public coastal recreational opportunities as sea levels rise threatens to drown our remaining beaches - especially for activities that can occur elsewhere. While the City’s public transportation system may help some inland residents to access the pool, the distance will still be a barrier for many.
distance will still be a barrier for many.  +
IssueSummary On Thursday, the Coastal Commission approv
On Thursday, the Coastal Commission approved an appeal of a City of Long Beach coastal development permit for construction of a swimming pool complex with indoor component, cafe and public restroom covering 5.8 acres of beach space on Belmont Beach. The project raises important environmental justice, coastal access and beach preservation issues. First, the site is directly on public beach space. Second, the site will be subject to sea level rise hazards in the coming decades. Finally, the location of the public facility would be easily accessible to high income coastal residents but less accessible to lower income residents from inland neighborhoods. Many local residents, along with the Surfrider Foundation and Citizens About Responsible Planning, raised concerns with the project. Commissioners expressed concerns about the environmental justice implications of the project location but were generally satisfied with the City’s proposed public transportation plan. Ultimately, the Commissioners approved the project with the caveat that the City complete a robust public transportation plan to be presented to the Commission - other concerns with sea level rise and beach access were largely unaddressed. The vote was 10-1 with Commissioner Shelley Luce the lone dissenting vote against the project.
lone dissenting vote against the project.  +
IssueYear 2,021  +
Opposition Local residents, Surfrider Foundation  +
Policies Chapter 3  +
StaffRecommendation Approval with conditions  +
StaffReport https://documents.coastal.ca.gov/reports/2021/2/Th14a/th14a-2-2021-report.pdf  +
Has query
This property is a special property in this wiki.
Issue:Belmont Beach Aquatic Center + , Issue:Belmont Beach Aquatic Center +
Categories Issues
Modification date
This property is a special property in this wiki.
26 February 2021 16:49:11  +
hide properties that link here 
Vote:Vote 33pji1krt + , Vote:Vote 3mjc0x9sg + , Vote:Vote 3n72gtpo0 + , Vote:Vote 94u7ahreg + , Vote:Vote ag35qh735 + , Vote:Vote flsr7slkq + , Vote:Vote h5cskyuyb + , Vote:Vote kynsm5evv + , Vote:Vote qtm9v2pnr + , Vote:Vote svg1m57wl + , Vote:Vote t3dvyqz9o + VoteIssue
 

 

Enter the name of the page to start browsing from.