Browse wiki

Issue:Gaviota Coast Plan
DecisionType LCP Amendment  +
IssueImage gaviota2.jpg  +
IssueMonth August  +
IssueOutcome Good  +
IssueOutcomeDescription Commissioner Mary Luevano motioned to appr
Commissioner Mary Luevano motioned to approve staff recommendation and Commissioner Erik Howell seconded the motion. Commissioners made one small concession to the County, amending staff’s recommendation to add an exception that legally existing development at El Capitan campground may be maintained and repaired without an increase in additional ESHA buffer zone.
n increase in additional ESHA buffer zone.  +
IssueReason The proposed Plan, with Coastal Commission staff’s modifications provides greater assurance that public access, recreational opportunities, sensitive habitat and agricultural practices will be preserved and restored.  +
IssueSummary F16a Gaviota Coast Plan County of Santa Ba
F16a Gaviota Coast Plan County of Santa Barbara LCP Amendment No. LCP-4-STB-18-0039-1 Part B (Gaviota Coast Plan) The proposed Gaviota Coast Plan will function as a new stand-alone area plan in the County’s LCP. The plan covers several important topics including environmentally sensitive habitat areas (ESHA), agriculture, principle permitted uses and public access and recreation. The Environmental Defense Center participated in the development of the plan for many years to ensure maximum environmental protections. “Through the Coastal Commission process, the Gaviota Coast Plan has been improved to provide better protection for wildlife and habitats, agriculture, public access and recreation, and cultural resources,” said Linda Krop, Chief Counsel of the Environmental Defense Center. “The Plan provides a vision to retain the unique scenic, rural nature of the Gaviota Coast for years to come. We will urge the County of Santa Barbara to accept the Commission’s recommended improvements when the matter is considered later this fall.” The Plan, as proposed and modified by Coastal Commission staff, includes important modifications with relation to blufftop development and public access. The Surfrider Foundation strongly supported the policies that address bluff top development and ensure consistency with the Coastal Resiliency Project. Further, Surfrider supported the Plan’s public access policies. There is a great need for more vertical access opportunities and the plan as modified sets the intention toward that goal. Specifically, staff recommended modifications that new development does not interfere with the public’s right to beach access – and that without the “if feasible” loophole. The Plan also protects informal roadside parking. Such parking areas are integral to ensuring safe, equitable access to area beaches. A few discrepancies remained between the County of Santa Barbara and Coastal Commission staff at the time of the hearing. Specifically, the County wanted to retain autonomy over determining ESHA buzzer zones for new development. Commissioners unanimously approved the Gaviota Coast Plan with one small caveat that facilities at El Capitan Campground can be repaired and maintained without an increase in ESHA buffer zone.
d without an increase in ESHA buffer zone.  +
IssueYear 2,018  +
Policies Chapter 3  +
StaffRecommendation Approval with Modifications  +
StaffReport https://documents.coastal.ca.gov/reports/2018/8/f16a/F16a-8-2018-report.pdf  +
Has query
This property is a special property in this wiki.
Issue:Gaviota Coast Plan + , Issue:Gaviota Coast Plan +
Categories Issues
Modification date
This property is a special property in this wiki.
31 August 2018 16:01:52  +
hide properties that link here 
Vote:Vote 0j74ex69n + , Vote:Vote 5y2qxses4 + , Vote:Vote 6it76oeee + , Vote:Vote a4y6186o2 + , Vote:Vote e72h4lleg + , Vote:Vote fb9a6u00h + , Vote:Vote gmm3stptq + , Vote:Vote q3ydoelx5 + , Vote:Vote qof7wjb51 + , Vote:Vote ttp3x8rws + , Vote:Vote tv9yfp3rk + , Vote:Vote ujhep3a4k + VoteIssue


Enter the name of the page to start browsing from.