Browse wiki

Issue:Laguna Beach Setbacks Appeal
DecisionType De Novo  +
IssueImage Screen Shot 2019-04-23 at 12.53.46 PM.png  +
IssueMonth April  +
IssueOutcome Good  +
IssueOutcomeDescription Commissioner Mary Luévano expressed unease
Commissioner Mary Luévano expressed unease. “If we go in one direction we begin a sea change in the way we develop or don’t along the coast,” she said, adding that we need to err on the side of caution in protecting public resources. Commissioner Luéveno motioned to deny the proposal. Commissioner Sara Aminzadeh agreed, pointing out that the proposed development is in direct conflict with several of the City’s Local Coastal Program policies. Commissioner Mark Vargas pondered how this might translate into managed retreat in Laguna Beach, noting that neighboring homes in may not be able to do any further major development.
able to do any further major development.  +
IssueReason As proposed, the project would have set a
As proposed, the project would have set a negative precedent by allowing new development on a bluff face that requires hard armoring to assure geologic stability, contrary to numerous policies in the certified LCP for Laguna Beach. As sea levels rise, new development and perpetuation of non-conforming development that results in more hard armoring will increase beach loss and greatly impact public resources.
loss and greatly impact public resources.  +
IssueSummary The City of Laguna Beach had approved a pe
The City of Laguna Beach had approved a permit for a 1600 square-foot addition and remodel of a blufftop home with additional structures, grading and landscaping; the proposed renovations would have expanded the floor area beyond an additional 50-percent, making it a major remodel. The project came before the Commission on appeal, with staff recommending denial. Staff explained that the proposed project would not conform with the City’s Land Use Element (LUE) which specifies a minimum 25-foot setback from the bluff edge – this development would actually be sited seaward of the bluff edge, on the bluff face, in direct conflict with the LUE. The applicant spent an inordinate amount of time disputing Coastal Commission staff’s definition of the bluff edge to, ultimately, no avail. The existing home already does not conform to modern oceanfront bluff edge setbacks, and the Commission found that the City-approved addition would also increase the size and degree of nonconformity, which is prohibited under the Coastal Act. By denying this proposal, Commissioners affirmed that major improvements, beyond repair and maintenance, may not increase degree of nonconformity. Commissioners denied the proposed remodel in a 7-2 vote.
denied the proposed remodel in a 7-2 vote.  +
IssueYear 2,019  +
Lobbyist Anne Blemker, Susan McCabe, Steve Kaufmann  +
Opposition Mark Fudge - Appellant  +
Policies Chapter 3  +
StaffRecommendation Denial  +
StaffReport https://documents.coastal.ca.gov/reports/2019/4/Th18a/Th18a-4-2019-report.pdf  +
Has query
This property is a special property in this wiki.
Issue:Laguna Beach Setbacks Appeal + , Issue:Laguna Beach Setbacks Appeal +
Categories Issues
Modification date
This property is a special property in this wiki.
23 April 2019 19:55:19  +
hide properties that link here 
Vote:Vote 4th881iwc + , Vote:Vote bw1mm67ao + , Vote:Vote cj6938ggt + , Vote:Vote jpgqzozzz + , Vote:Vote ju2c3c5bi + , Vote:Vote p5dc1r54n + , Vote:Vote ub8s0a545 + , Vote:Vote vwq4yd3oq + , Vote:Vote x4psuq0sb + , Vote:Vote zgu2xvevu + , Vote:Vote zmrh5jhuz + VoteIssue


Enter the name of the page to start browsing from.