Special

Browse wiki

Issue:Pacific Grove LCP Update
DecisionType LCP Certification  +
IssueImage PGtrail.jpeg  +
IssueMonth November  +
IssueOutcome Bad  +
IssueOutcomeDescription Commission Executive Director Jack Ainswor
Commission Executive Director Jack Ainsworth commented that while this update is not perfect, it is a compromise that the City and staff reached. He said it was a give and take to “get to LCP across the finish line.” Commissioners agreed and unanimously passed the LCP update with staff’s suggested modifications.
date with staff’s suggested modifications.  +
IssueReason Now and in the future, the coastal trail s
Now and in the future, the coastal trail should be compatible with saving our coast from sea level rise, not serve as merely a way to view what we’ve lost. We should protect this crown jewel of the California coast and in doing so set an example for what can – and should – be done all along the state.
and should – be done all along the state.  +
IssueSummary The City of Pacific Grove proposed to upda
The City of Pacific Grove proposed to update its local coastal program, originally certified in 1989. Notably, updates include new sections related to sea level rise, flood and hazard abatement, environmentally sensitive habitat areas (ESHA), wetland protection, water quality enhancement, and tribal/archaeological protections. The Surfrider Foundation objected to policies that allow armoring of the City’s coastal trail, asking the Commission to instead amend the update to prohibit shoreline armoring of the coastal trail and public access amenities that could be relocated inland. Surfrider also urged the Commission to remain consistent with their policy guidance documents and previous decisions by defining redevelopment as any cumulative development completed after January 1, 1977, instead of the date of certification of the LCP, as proposed. To do otherwise would set a terrible precedent as local jurisdictions across the state tackle their sea level rise plans and are looking at these early examples for guidance on acceptable adaptation policies.Unfortunately, the Commission did not incorporate these suggestions and unanimously passed the update as modified by staff.
ly passed the update as modified by staff.  +
IssueYear 2,019  +
Opposition Surfrider Foundation, Asilomar Dunes Residents  +
Policies Chapter 3  +
StaffRecommendation Approval with Modifications  +
StaffReport https://documents.coastal.ca.gov/reports/2019/11/F8a/F8a-11-2019-report.pdf  +
Has query
This property is a special property in this wiki.
Issue:Pacific Grove LCP Update + , Issue:Pacific Grove LCP Update +
Categories Issues
Modification date
This property is a special property in this wiki.
21 November 2019 21:11:55  +
hide properties that link here 
Vote:Vote 29lt5et7b + , Vote:Vote 4mv36nil5 + , Vote:Vote 6cemigsej + , Vote:Vote 7hvbkucoj + , Vote:Vote ifzdyfcka + , Vote:Vote lit5esr92 + , Vote:Vote osgfaz46z + , Vote:Vote p30efnryb + , Vote:Vote steujlkeh + , Vote:Vote sum55b34u + , Vote:Vote tdf8f9r31 + , Vote:Vote zlcsj104t + VoteIssue
 

 

Enter the name of the page to start browsing from.