Browse wiki

Issue:Santa Cruz Beach Curfew
DecisionType Coastal Development Permit  +
IssueImage March 2020 Santa Cruz Beach Management Plan.png  +
IssueMonth March  +
IssueOutcome Bad  +
IssueOutcomeDescription Several Commissioners expressed concern ab
Several Commissioners expressed concern about the proposed beach curfew, which the City justified as necessary due to safety concerns, especially among the area’s unsheltered population who often spend time at the beach at night. Commissioner Zahirah Mann noted that “safety concerns” are often used to sometimes exclude different populations. Commissioner Erik Howell, who was among those voted against giving the city its permit, said curfews should be set in a way that is the least restrictive way possible. Some Commissioners also noted that creating a police state on the public’s beach could set a poor precedent for the rest of the state.
poor precedent for the rest of the state.  +
IssueReason The California Coastal Commission has hist
The California Coastal Commission has historically opposed beach curfews; the agency’s LCP update guidance states that “Closure to public use of any portion of the beach inland of the mean high tide line is not encouraged.” In the zone between “disallows” and “is not encouraged,” however, many conflicting issues of access, resource protection, social inequity, public safety, California’s homelessness crisis and the ability of jurisdictions to enforce our agreed-upon laws exists.
ns to enforce our agreed-upon laws exists.  +
IssueSummary The City of Santa Cruz sought, as part of
The City of Santa Cruz sought, as part of its beach management plan, a curfew at its Main Beach from midnight to 5 a.m. The adjacent beach, Cowell’s, already has a similar curfew, which the City asked to continue. In its application, the City listed “narcotic use, alcohol consumption and abuse, littering and trash, fires, water quality, camping, vendor storage and drug paraphernalia” as the reasons this curfew is necessary. Since most of what was listed is already illegal, opponents to the curfew argued that disallowing people on the beach would criminalize sleeping, sitting, generally hanging out and otherwise merely existing on the beach outside of the wet sand. (The curfew would exempt the wet sand in order to allow for surfing, swimming and walking along water’s edge.) The City of Santa Cruz also stated that despite the nighttime access restriction on Cowell Beach, “criminal activity has been persistent and ongoing during the nighttime hours at Cowell Beach.” The City notes that the police department is too understaffed to effectively patrol the beach for existing crime, all of which raised the question of how the police will have enough staffing to enforce an extended curfew. Commissioners approved the curfew in a split vote.
oners approved the curfew in a split vote.  +
IssueYear 2,020  +
Opposition Stepping up Santa Cruz  +
Policies Chapter 3  +
StaffRecommendation Approval with Conditions  +
StaffReport https://documents.coastal.ca.gov/reports/2020/3/W22c/W22c-3-2020 report.pdf  +
Has query
This property is a special property in this wiki.
Issue:Santa Cruz Beach Curfew + , Issue:Santa Cruz Beach Curfew +
Categories Issues
Modification date
This property is a special property in this wiki.
24 March 2020 18:27:41  +
hide properties that link here 
Vote:Vote 1sf3bpc7d + , Vote:Vote 9xd9t3ghy + , Vote:Vote enu1fuow7 + , Vote:Vote fj85qixgv + , Vote:Vote fqu94qhyf + , Vote:Vote g66esvlrw + , Vote:Vote hboyqb1v4 + , Vote:Vote kxiecktx9 + , Vote:Vote mhafju7h6 + , Vote:Vote s9elz2k1y + , Vote:Vote tq548wa1e + , Vote:Vote ye8s10eyl + VoteIssue


Enter the name of the page to start browsing from.